New Position with CellarPros

Today I am excited to announce that I have recently begun working as a Fine Wine Consultant with CellarPros, an affiliate of Benchmark Wine, one of the largest marketers and service providers of wine in the country.

My expertise with fine wine and collectors will allow CellarPros to bring a new level of cellar service to the south central part of the country. I will be a key part of CellarPros national team and will specifically focus on cellars in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma as well as charities and their needs. I imagine many of your either have wine collections, or know people who do, that could potentially benefit from our services.

CellarPros provides a full suite of services to cover any need the serious collector may have. Our primary business to date has been acquiring private cellars from collectors and retailers that they may wish to liquidate in part or in whole due to any number of reasons including relocation, change in tastes, divorce, death or just the need to raise cash.

CellarPros Services include:

  • Wine cellar inventory and appraisal
  • Inventory management
  • Shipping and storage logistics
  • Consulting to acquire wines for a collection
  • Advisory for brokerage of a wine collection
  • Subscription to Wine Market Journal for wine auction records and analysis

If you or someone you know has a wine cellar I would welcome the opportunity to meet or setup a phone conversation to further discuss how we can work together.

Remember, Eat well and drink even better,

Marshall

Farewell

Friends,

I am writing to tell you that, as of today, I am no longer serving as the Executive Director of the Wine and Food Foundation of Texas (WFFT).  I am, however, thrilled to announce that my recent separation will allow me to pursue some exciting new opportunities, including working with an up-and-coming consulting group in the food & beverage industries and other innovative endeavors using my expertise and relationships I have been so fortunate to develop over the years.

I do want to take this opportunity to say how proud I am of my three years at WFFT and all that was accomplished during this time. The successes are many, including:

  • having the most successful philanthropic year in 2013 – awarding more than $160,000 to many deserving chefs, sommeliers, and causes;
  • sending several sommeliers to study in France and Italy with renowned winemakers and educators, and many local cooks to intern with great chefs like Michael Mina (Mina Group), David Chang (Momfuku), Tyson Cole (Uchi), and Jason Dady (Bin 555);
  • increasing the WFFT membership almost four-fold and starting the High Plains Chapter in North Texas; and
  • hosting some of the Foundation’s most successful events, including Big Reds & Bubbles and Tour de Vin, and starting a new one, Cowboys & Gauchos, all of which introduced many local, talented, and up-and-coming chefs and restaurants to our attendees.

None of this could have been accomplished in such a short amount of time without the Board of Directors, Advisory Council, so many great volunteers and hard-working interns, and the most amazing staff I have had the honor of working with – a big shout out and many, many thanks to Donaji, Jennifer, Becca, Melissa, Cathleen & Morgan!  I am so proud of all of your hard work and our amazing accomplishments.  The six of you truly made my job fun, exciting and worthwhile. You inspired me every day and I would be honored to work with each of you in the future.

During my time at WFFT I have learned a lot, made so many friends, and shared plenty of amazing food & wine. I am very thankful for having had this opportunity and look forward to continuing to work and enjoy many good times with all of you in the future.

Now I am reaching out to you to ask for your help. If you or anyone you know of is looking for someone who is dedicated, hard working and available, please pass my name along or send them my way.  In return, I am offering you my service; if there is something you need or anything I can do for you, please do not hesitate to ask.  You have all done so much for me in my role at WFFT; I want to give back to you.

Thank you in advance for your help.  I hope to catch up with you individually soon!

T. Marshall Jones
Eat well and drink even better

For now, please contact me at:
tmjen555@gmail.com
(512) 694-0491

Now We Can House the Homeless! (Finally)

Let me begin by thanking several people:

  • Mayor Leffingwell for your leadership on the dais in promoting the need for Housing-first Permanent Supportive Housing!
  • Mayor Pro Tem Cole for your leadership in presenting an amendment to the Density Bonus supporting Housing-first Permanent Supportive Housing
  • City Council members Morrison, Tovo, Martinez and Riley for voting in favor of the Density Bonus as amended to allow for the funds generated in Downtown Austin to be used for Housing-first Permanent Supportive Housing. (And I am sure i would be thanking Councilman Spellman as wee had he been on the dais to vote)
  • Ann Howard, Ann Denton, Ed McHorse and the rest of my ECHO Board members for making Housing-first Permanent Supportive Housing a priority in our mission being fiercely committed to ending homelessness
  • Charlie Betts, Bill Brice, Julie Fitch and the rest of my Downtown Austin Alliance Board members for taking the charge on making lemonade out of lemons pertaining to the Density Bonus
  • The Planning Commission and Downtown Commission for supporting an amendment to the Density Bonus supporting Housing-first Permanent Supportive Housing

Last night, the Austin City Council passed the (so-called) Density Bonus allowing developers wishing to build residential units downtown the ability to apply for great FAR (Floor to Area ratio) than is currently allowable by paying a fee-in-lieu of $X per square foot to be spent on affordable housing, specifically amended to define affordable housing as Housing-first Permanent Supportive Housing.  This is a big deal in a city that is in need of 38,000+ affordable housing units and is the first step in housing the truly homeless, those categorized as chronically homeless.  These are the men, women, children, veterans and disabled individuals that are the most vulnerable and most need our help forced to sleep in our streets, parks, woodlands and ditches alike.

The fact is there is not enough money available to build the 38,000+ plus affordable homes needed and, until now, there has been no reason to build housing for the chronically homeless.  Simple market economics state that when there is a shortage of housing, or anything for that matter, the market will cater to the highest end of the need and the least risky investment.  In this case, affordable housing, a developer is going to build housing for the easiest to house, the wealthiest of the population and the lowest risk tenant.  This would be anyone other than those we most need to house.  So the simple economics haft left the chronically homeless out in the cold, literally.

It has been proven that the only way to get someone interested in building housing for the poorest of the poor, the hardest to serve and highest rick clients is to either be so overstocked with housing that anyone and everyone finds a place to live, or to force the issue by making that the free money for which developers can apply.  Our Council just did the latter last night and I applaud them for their wisdom, courage and action.

Marshall

The Four Winners of the Senate Filibuster

Image

So by now the whole world knows about Wendy Davis’ 11-hour (though I still give her credit for the almost full 13 hours as she stood by her post through two hours of debate) filibuster to kill Senate Bill 5 (SB5) aimed at tightening abortion laws.

This was a historic day in the Texas Senate and that is not necessarily a good thing.  I have heard form many sources, including Senators that have been representing some of you for a long time, maybe too long, that have seen many filibusters come and go that the behavior and disrespect for each other was nothing less than horrific.  for the best commentary on that, role back Senator John Whitmire’s passionate plea for respect and decorum on the floor.  Whether you agree or disagree with the premise behind SB5, whether you agree or disagree with Wendy Davis’ decision to filibuster and whether you agree or disagree with the rules of the Senate allowing such a filibuster to stop the people’s business, the fact is that it is a rule and most Senators of the past have respected that rule even when they despised the premise or purpose.  There is a reason almost every vote in the Senate ends 31 – 0.  They air their laundry behind closed doors, come to a consensus and respect the politics that landed them all there in the first place.

And if that were not bad enough, the jeers from the gallery and total disrespect of the chamber in which they sat the final eleven minutes just cost you all roughly $330,000 per day to continue this debate.  Has the role call been completed on time, SB5 would have passed and it is likely a second Special Session would not have been called.  Trust me. SB5 in a new iteration will pass.  Period.  All we did we put on a very expensive show that at the end of the day left us with four big winners and one big loser – who is also our fourth winner.

Setting aside the deplorable decorum of the night, there was a very interesting dynamic that ended up playing out although the fate of it’s course was set several hours and days prior to that fateful day.  Here is what happened, why it happened and how it had to play out the way it did:

  • The House failed to get SB5 back to the Senate early enough to avoid a likely filibuster sans the return of Judge Bill Meier
  • This left the Senate 13 hours to pass three bills: SB5, a bill relating to transportation funding and a bill relating to the prosecution of 17=year old offenders
  • At approximately 11:14am, Lt. Governor David Dewhurst called the session to order and decide to take up SB5 first.  In a Special Session, this is a privilege of the presiding officer
  • At approximately 11:18am, Wendy Davis began her filibuster
  • Sometime around 10:00pm (and three martinis for this writer later), a third point of order was called on Senator Davis setting off two hours of Parliamentary Points of Order and Inquiries that I can only describe as a Robert’s Rules of Order bracket opening and closing worthy of the best Microsoft Excel equation – except that in Excel, at least a computer is keeping track of what came before what before what and after what.
  • Then, with maybe 11 minutes remaining before the drama would be timed out, it was finally ruled that the filibuster was officially over and the vote on SB5 could be taken on the floor
  • A role vote was called for but never finished in time due to the disruption of the idiots in the gallery

So at the end of the day, all three bills were left for dead leaving many to question why the Lt. Governor decided to take up SB5 before the remaining two bills.  Was it to kill the other two bills intentionally?  Was it to make Ms. Davis suffer as long as possible?  Or was it really not a choice he had any longer?  I will argue the third.

You see, because the House did not get SB5 back to the Senate before the last day, and a filibuster-able (like that?) amount of time, the chess pieces were already lined up for the checkmate. And that leads us to the winners and losers of this very expensive match.

Winner #1: The Austin Club.  Easily.

Winner #2: Senator Wendy Davis.  Ms. Davis’s filibuster gained her such notoriety that she is getting more national face time than a Kardashian’s iPhone.  She is poised for a $35 million swelling of her war-chest that can then use to run for the office of her choice.  She may not wine, but she is the most legitimate Democrat in Texas right now.

Winner 3: Lt Governor Dewhurst.  Mr. Dewhurst saw the chess pieces on the Board and made the only move he could, SB5.  By calling SB5 before the other two bills, he forced everyone’s hand resulting in the only result that could have resulted,  An eventual checkmate that will end with him getting his much needed abortion bill passed while also giving his boss, Governor Perry, the victory on the remaining two bills, plus any other bill he may want to add a later date (read Special Session #2).  When the day began, the Lt Governor seemingly had two choices: Call SB5 first, or call SB5 last.  He actually did not choose, he moved his chess piece and waited.  You see, by calling SB5 first, only two outcomes could have resulted: Senator Davis succeed in her filibuster killing al three bills or Senator Davis fails in her filibuster passing all three bills.  Had Dewhurst called SB5 last, after passing the first two bills, he was a grave risk of Senator Davis succeeding in killing SB5 leaving that the sole loser of the day.  Perry may be crazy, but even he is not stupid enough to call a second Special Session just to save face for his second-hand man and thus committing his own political suicide.  So, the choice was not a choice; the only way to make damn sure his abortion law passes is to make are all three bills pass.  With all three bills going down, Governor Perry has the reason needed to call a second Special Session thus reviving Dewhurst’s abortion bill.

Winner #4 and Loser #1: Governor Rick Perry.  The Govenor is one politically savvy dude, enough so that he is soon to gain tenure and become Governor Emeritus.  Once the chips we all on the table, he simply allowed Dewhurst to make his move assuring that all four of the bills he put on the call would pass.  He already accomplished in getting SB2, the bill relating to redistricting and the original reason for the Special Session, successfully through both houses and sent to his desk to sign in to law.  The remainder of the bills were simply gravy so tasty that he could not let them go down so he now has the will to call a second very costly special session.  And you know what they say about there not being any such thing as bad press so lang as they spell your name right?  “Perry” has been spelled correctly a lot lately and it will continue to be so as the rest of the world watches, fascinated, with the politics he puppeteers of this great State.

However, this win will also come with a burden to bear and that is his complete and utter loss of love and support from his once adoring “XX” chromosomal voter and fans.  Remember “Good Hair Perry” in his good looks, great smile, sharp suits, shiny cowboy boots and perfect quaff wooing the women of Texas and beyond not unlike a certain Mr. Clinton? Gone. Done. Toast. In Governor Perry’s bid for the last Presidential election, his female following cratered quickly and that was just the beginning.  As the SCOTUS makes decision after decision in this historic week giving more rights to those viewed unequal, Governor Perry continues to impose his will on his once strongest support base, the Women of Texas and the United States.  They despise him at such a level that not only will they never vote for him again, neither will any husband, boyfriend. father or son who has to face the wrath of a woman Perry scorned.

Let’s hope many lessons were learned in this National spotlight on our politics as one Senator took advantage of possibly our strangest legislative rule resulting in four winners and one loser.  Actually, after watching the tape again, maybe the real loser were the people of Texas who once had faith in the last bastion of political respect.

I’d e happy to discuss this over lunch and a drink at The Austin Club.

Marshall

KeepATXAffordable

Today, I joined with a broad coalition of business, faith, and community leaders in kicking off Keep Austin Affordable (http://KeepATXAffordable.org)! Keep Austin Affordable is a community-led campaign to raise awareness about the great need that exists in Austin for affordable housing, the local solutions that work, and the public investment that’s critical to addressing this growing challenge for our city.
We were all surprised when the affordable housing bonds were narrowly rejected by Austin voters last November. That’s why I am a part of Keep Austin Affordable and our call for city bonds to be put back on the ballot in November 2013.

Go to http://KeepATXAffordable.org to join the effort!

Did you know that Austin is in the top 10 most expensive rental markets in the nation? Over 38,000 families in Austin cannot find an affordable place to call home. And Austin ISD reports 1975 students were homeless last year.

While the need is great, the city’s affordable housing program, in partnership with local organizations, has been incredibly successful.

Previous bonds have helped build and repair thousands of affordable homes for seniors, working families, veterans, and people with disabilities.

Funding affordable housing bonds isn’t just the right thing to do. It’s economically smart.

The bonds improve the social health and the economic health of Austin. They generate rent and property taxes for the city and revitalizes neighborhoods and raises property values. Every city dollar attracts four more in matching funds from outside sources, so the money goes a long way.

It’s an investment-in people and in the city. It will help keep Austin the kind of place that we admire and enjoy living in.

We need your help to spread the word and keep a good thing going!

Go to http://KeepATXAffordable.org to join the effort!

And be sure to like the campaign on Facebook at http://Facebook.com/KeepAustinAffordable and follow it on Twitter at http://Twitter.com/keepatxafford.

Sorry, Austin, You Suck

Well, that’s it.  I am no longer proud to call myself an Austinite.  I am proud to say I am from Houston.  A great city.  a real city.  I have tried so hard to be proud of you. I put up with the skinny jeans; I put up with the jorts, I put up with the yoga pants, I put up with the ridiculous looking tank tops; I even put up with gladiator sandals…on dudes.  I put up with your ‘I’m too creative to be burdened with society’ crap.  I put up with seemingly half of you having no real jobs and not adding any real value to our economy.  I have managed a great amount of restraint in wanting to believe you were worthy of the accolades you have received in being named one of the greatest cities to live in the USA.  But no longer.

Yesterday’s November 6th election was proof that you really are no better than any other city in the US.  You truly do not care about your fellow neighbors; you don’t pay attention and you blindly follow the pack of lemmings before you.  You’re just not that damn smart after all.  I know, your too busy being clever with your blogs sipping $8 french press coffee to truly give a damn about this city you love to call home.  My prediction, in 10 years 50% of will have already moved on to the next ‘great city’ because you have certainly f***** this one up.

Let me tell what you did yesterday since you either don’t know (ignorance is absolutely no excuse) or, worse, knowingly don’t care.

Yesterday, you voted to spend hundreds, maybe thousands, of millions of dollars to revamp your entire system of government and likely did not even know it.  You voted to grow the council from 7 members to 11 members. Really?? Any idea what the personnel cost alone will be annually? Let’s use Council Member Riley’s office as an example: the Council member plus his three staff earn $202,966 annually (Texas Tribune lists salaries of all staff so this math is exact).  That means for 6 Council members we spend $1.218M annually.  Adding another four Council members adds another $811,864 annually.  Then lest add another 30% for benefits, pension, etc and you get an additional $1.156 million annually!  That’s

I am mad you spent this money.  It’s completely unnecessary.  Completely!  On top of that, you did a lot of other bad things as well including voting for a new civil service agreement that no longer allows the City to hire and fire at will, like every other business in Texas.  It has been estimated this new change will add additional millions of dollars to our city government.

What else could you do?  You also decided to vote for single member districts to be drawn, approved by the Court system and then by all of you.  What were you thinking?  Better representation?  Really?  How much will this legal battle cost us? $100 million?  $500 million?  More??  For the same reason you hate the Republicans at the State level, you just approved this form of redistricting at the City level!!

Now we get to divide the City in to 10 pieces and select the one person who gets to represent that one district.  Not the City of Austin, one district.  How could that end poorly??

All I heard from you was “no more taxes” yet you just spent $1.156 million annually in salaries, who knows how much in administrative costs plus the costs of changing our entire city charter to add ten single member districts.  What’s a $1 billion or so dollars over the next few years… Additionally, you passed every single bond initiative; every single one except one: Prop 15: Affordable Housing

And then the coup de grace: You let your true colors show.  I have already proven this election was not about money.  You just went on a spending spree that would make a drunken Sailor and his gold-digger wife from Tarrant County proud.  So what, then, caused you to vote to spend hundreds of millions of dollars (most needlessly) and then decide that  you can’t spend $78.3 million on affordable housing??

The truth is, Austin, you are nothing more than a bunch of NIIMBY’s.  It wasn’t about the money.  You passed Proposition 18 for arts and culture with flying colors yet our museum system in Austin is barely third world worthy.  Would it surprise you to know that $3.8 million was buried in there for the Women’s and Children’s Shelter?  It’s probably a good thing you didn’t know that or you would have voted that down too.

You are pathetic.  You’ll spend millions on anything, anything, as long as it does not mean building housing for those disgusting poor people in your backyard.  How dare they build housing for the poor, sick, dying, vulnerable and needy.  The homeless.  You’d rather do anything than stop people from dying on the streets.  Like they deserve, right?  One person dies on our streets every three days yet you don’t care.  So long as they don’t die in your backyard, housed or otherwise.

Wake up, Austin, you’re not so damn clever after all.  You’re just like everyone else.

Now it’s our turn

OK fellow Austinites,

Now it’s your turn. Wait, that’s not right. It’s OUR time. Time for us to step up and act. Act as one. But as individuals. This is one of those times where the O’s the parts is greater than the whole.

This is painless. I promise. All I am asking you to do is vote. But I am also telling you HOW to vote and why to vote as I tell you.

We have an upcoming Presidential election and so we will have a large and wondrous turnout for the upcoming November 6th election. Well, ‘wondrous’ may be a bit of a bold statement, but it is the largest turnout we get as

FACT: Voting YES to EVERY Proposition on the ballot will not increase your taxes. Not one red cent. While this may be a massive shortcoming of our current government and a tremendous missed opportunity, that is a different post for a different day (which you will never read here).

For those of you short on time and attention (or the rare few of you who trust me) I implore you to slog through 12 or pages of the ballot and vote:
VOTE YES to Proposition 1
VOTE YES to Proposition 15
VOTE YES to Proposition 17

That’s it. Done!!

Now, for those of you who need some reasoning behind my suggestions (or do not trust me implicitly) on how your exercise your 1st and 26th Amendment right to vote, please read on.

I’ll take each Proposition one at time. Feel free to skip,to the one that interests you (but still vote YES for Propositions 1, 15 and 17.

Proposition 1: Funding for a Central Teaching Hospital
Well, yes and no. Here is why I am supporting Proposition 1
– $35 million dollars from Prop 1 will be used to fund Mental Health Care for Austin’s most mentally ill
– Austin spends the least amount of money on our mentally ill of any city in Austin. Surprised? I was to. So much for the blueberry in a bowl of strawberry soup.
– Texas spends the least amount of money on our mentally ill of any state in the nation. Not a surprise.
– Due to a Federal regulation called “1115 waivers”, we can spend $1.46 for every dollar we commit to serving our mentally ill
– that means, if we vote YES to Proposition 1, we are really saying YES to spending $51.1 million on mental care for our most vulnerable, mentally ill.

It’s that simple, Austin. Due to the leverage of the Federal Government, we the citizens can close the gap on necessary funding for the mentally ill. The homeless living on the street in the elements without the care. For families, children, the sick and the dying. Call it a compassionate play.

Proposition 15: Affordable Housing
Proposition 15 affords $78.3 million for all types of affordable housing. While I do not personally support the entire proposition, sometimes we have to look through the forest to see the trees.
– A (much to small) portion of these funds will go to Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH).
– Let’s call it 20%, or $15.6 million.
– PSH gives homeless people a home.
1person dies on the streets of Austin EVERY 3 days.
– The City has already committed to building 350 units of PSH and so far has built 140 leaving 210 remaining.
– At a cost of approximately $76,000 per unit to build, the City is actually on the hook for another ~$16 million JUST to build these units.

Do the math.

Oh. By the way. We actually have a need for 1886 units according the Cities own studies. That’s $132 million for you math heads.

Proposition 17: Women and Children’s Shelter
Really? Do we need to cover why this is important? It’s women and children. OK, seriously. This is a lay-up.
– God bless Irit. She was instrumental in getting an additional $3 million for to help our homeless and near homeless women and children.
– While there are other initiatives being funded here, remember the forest.
– We have a great Women’s and Children’s shelter and with more funds, it will be more awesome.
– If we can’t help our most vulnerable citizens, who the hell can we help?

Thank you for your time and paying attention to these crucial matters. Remember, if you were to vote YES to every proposition on the ballot, it would not raise your taxes one red cent. Period.

So join me. Let’s take responsibility for our neighbors; our most vulnerable; our fellow Austinites. If you don’t vote for me – vote for them.

Thank you,
Marshall

An open letter to Austin regarding our homeless

T. Marshall Jones

555 E. 5th Street Austin TX 78701  tmjen555@gmail.com

September 22, 2012

RE: An open letter to my fellow Austinites on homelessness

Dear Austinites,

Recently my wife and I started watching a new Drama on television called Perception. In this show, the protagonist, Dr. Daniel Pierce played by Eric McCormack, is an eccentric neuroscientist diagnosed and living with schizophrenia who teaches psychology in a college setting and helps the federal government (a past student specifically) solve various crimes.

Dr. Pierce hallucinates people that aren’t there often conversing with them about his thoughts and, even more often, that conversation usually leads him to the answers necessary to solve the crime. However, as with any psychological disorder, it begins to affect his ‘normal’ life and his interactions with the real world. The conundrum: get back on his meds and stop the hallucinations (and therefore the conversations that help him tap his consciousness) or continue as is and possibly sacrifice his sanity and real relationships.

What I like most about this show is the honest look at someone living a seemingly highly functional life while truly being on the brink of the end. I mean, think about it; don’t we all wonder about ourselves a little bit when we do something odd, unusual, silly, weird or just plain out character? How close might we all be to the brink?

“Are you finished yet?”

Sorry, I was just trying to let the reader in on my thoughts.

“Don’t you have something important to say? They aren’t going to stick around reading your dribble forever.”

They can always jump to the bottom if they’re out of patience, but again, my apologies. Why do we apologize so often and so readily? I’ll have to think about that, but there are some things I will not apologize for including my view of the homeless in Austin. Let me explain.

My wife and I moved downtown seven and a half years ago living at 5th and Neches in the Hilton hotel (yes, there are condos in there). Anyone who has been downtown recently knows what I mean when I say we have a terrible homeless problem. Terrible. I mean they are everywhere. All the time. Screaming, panhandling, begging, sleeping, wandering, loitering…

“Now I’m sorry. Did you say ‘they’?”

Yes. They. Them. Those people. Always panhandling. Always asking for money for the bus, for food, for beer, for anything, I know they really want to buy drugs.

“Maybe they really are hungry.”

Nope. There are 44 meals available, for free, for anyone downtown alone.

It’s not easy living downtown.

“Then why did you move there, genius?”

I didn’t realize the problem was so bad. I didn’t know my wife would be screamed at from a few feet away while walking the dog before the sun comes up. It was irritating. I decided to do something about it.

“It?”

Yes. It. So I joined in a conversation to stop panhandling downtown. We drew a circle around an area we could define as the ‘tourist zone’ (because clearly having them attacking our visitors is bad for the city economically), we made speeches, we rallied the troops and we made our pitch to City Hall.

“Crashed and burned, right Mav?”

Right. This was not a popular issue at City Hall amongst out politicians. They went out and bought ten foot poles to not touch this issue with. So now I had to try something different. I joined several groups focused on the safety of downtown. I started a blog cataloging crime in downtown. I wrote articles. I tweeted. I was determined to get these people out of my way.

“Damn right. You were just trying to live your life and had a right to do so in peace. You paid good money for that condo, you work hard and you pay your taxes.”

Damn right! We started a neighborhood watch group because of all the drug dealing going on right in front of our building. Drug dealers would walk clockwise along 5th Street from Trinity to Red River and the drug buyers would walk the same beat counter clockwise. This had to stop.

“What does that have to do with homelessness?”

Believe it or not, some of those walking counter clockwise were actually buying the drugs. As I said, begging for something other than food.

A few years went by and things remained the same. The homeless were homeless, we were not.

A funny story though, my wife and I were walking to 6th street one Sunday afternoon and as we passed Forbidden Fruit this seemingly homeless guy holding a guitar…

“Seemingly homeless? With a guitar?”

Seemingly. And yes, he had a guitar with a price tag hanging from it as if it were just purchased from a pawn shop. He was talking to two women who were in from out of town when he very, very quickly spun around and saw my wife and me. Without a pause he screamed, I mean screamed, “Jesus Christ has cursed your sex life”. Actually, to do it justice, I’ll type it like this: Jee-Zus   Christ   has  CURSED   your  SEEEXX LIIIIFE!

I have to say. I’ll never forget that man.

“Wait, so now ‘they’ are people, like you and me?”

What do you mean?

“You said ‘man’ as opposed to ‘it’.”

I never said they weren’t people did I? But no. They are not people like you and me. They live on the streets acting crazy and begging for money for drugs. That said, I kind of liked the guy that pointed out that our sex life had been cursed. Probably just saw my wedding ring.

I continued my good works downtown becoming President of the Downtown Austin Neighborhood Association (DANA). We all agreed that panhandling was really a big problem and we needed to do something about it.

In my attempt to still see that there was order downtown, I was asked to join the Downtown Austin Community Court Advisory Committee (DACC).

Downtown = my neighborhood. Court = stopping people from doing the things they were doing that they should not be doing.

It is basically a City Board (very official) that helps determine the course of the Community Court and see that they do their job effectively. A community court is not like your typical municipal court in that they do not put people in jail, they instead use another type of justice ‘sentencing’ those guilty of public disorder (public intoxication, urinating in public, sitting and lying where your not allowed to, AGGRESSIVE PANHANDLING, etc) to do rehab, community service or pay a fine. Aha! This was perfect for me because I could now find out why we have so much panhandling downtown and end it.

Did you know that almost EVERY ticket given for aggressive panhandling is given to a homeless person? Same with sit/ lie. So of course the same with PI, right? Wrong. Turns out those are reserved for college kids, army servicemen on leave and knucklehead tourists.

“And you?”.

No. Remember, I live there and can stagger home pretty easily.

So now I know what I need to do: make sure we are effectively prosecuting aggressive panhandling and sit/lie and we are home free.

I served dutifully on the DACC. I did notice, however, that some of the homeless people I had come to recognize over the years were not around any more, but there were always new ones to take their place. Maybe the court was being effective, but maybe not. We should research this.

So we did. We turned the DACC in to a statistic machine. We pulled data over the life of the court and learned that (PI’s excluded) about 90ish percent of the courts clients were homeless. We learned they have co-occurring disorders including drug abuse, alcoholism, mental illness. Maybe if we were to help these people with these disorders, maybe they will leave me alone. We found out that 60 people had cases with the court since it began in 1999 and 176 people had at least 25 cases with the court in the last two years.  These people were not being properly punished or helped. They are the frequent offenders.

“Help? We? You said ‘if we help these people’.”

Maybe I did. It does seem that if we help them and get them off the streets they won’t be there to beg for money or scream at me.

But let me finish. We also learned that the homeless people are costing the taxpayer lots and lots of money by being homeless. They are mass users of our emergency systems including EMS, AFD, emergency rooms, court visits and more. For the amount of money we spend on them how can they need more of my money on the streets?

So basically, it’s less expensive to house the homeless than it is to leave “$1 million Milton”…

“Nice Malcolm Gladwell reference, but actually it’s Murray”

Thanks. Murray. Turns out it’s less expensive to house the homeless than it is to allow them to remain on the streets. So just economically it’s makes sense to house the homeless so let’s just do that.

“Seems humane of you.”

Not humane per se, but economical. So we looked in to what it would take to house the homeless.

We learned that we are unable to house our clients because there are no houses for them. They’re crazy. They’re criminals. They have no money. They have nowhere to go.

I was then asked to join the board of ECHO. The Ending Community Homelessness Coalition. I was ecstatic because I now had a new means to my ends. If I can help ECHO house the homeless, I can finally resolve my problem.

“Your problem? What a pompous ass. Did you ever consider there are other people affected by the homeless?”

Of course. It told you I was the President of DANA. I have spoken to countless people about our homeless population. I mean, these are my neighbors. Of course I know tit affects more than just me.

“Neighbors?”

Sure. I told you I was president of DANA. I have lots of neighbors.

“Do you have any other ‘neighbors’?”

Not that I can think of. Wait! Do you mean the HOMELESS?

“Sure. Why not? Are they not living downtown as well?”

Well, I guess so. Nonetheless, I prefer they live in a home.

“So that they stop ‘begging’ you?”

Nice play on words. Not so they stop bugging me.

“Well, how’s it going?”

How’s what going?

“Housing the homeless?”

Terrible! We can’t find them housing anywhere. Did you know that in order to get housed you need an ID. You have to pass credit and criminal background checks. You have to have $35 for an application fee and then be able to pay rent.  How in the hell are they supposed to get an ID, pass a bunch of checks and get money.  They’re homeless for christ’s sake.

“So what can you do?”

What can we do, you mean. We have to find a way to break down all these barriers to housing. We need to get people housed first and then worry about getting them an ID and application fees. Almost all of them qualify for Social Security to pay their rent. But in the current system this can all take 240 days and that’s with professional case managers helping them every step of the way.

“That’s a long time, but why does it matter that they get housed before becoming technically eligible to move in to their home?”

Why?? Because 140 people experiencing homelessness died in the streets last year!! That’s one person every three days! In the 240 days it takes to house a homeless person, 80 people will have died. Eighty!

“Not to mention they won’t be sitting in your way, lying in the streets, panhandling and screaming at you.”

Screaming at me? They should be screaming at everyone. No matter how loud they scream, no one seems to be listening.

“You seem to be listening.”

Am I? I adopted a dog to keep it from being put to sleep; why haven’t I adopted a person?

“That’s not how it works. Earlier you said you wanted the homeless off the streets to end ‘public disorder’. Maybe you really want them off the streets so they stop dying in a terribly inhumane manner.”

Of course I want them to be allowed to die inside. More importantly I want them to be able to live. In a home. They’re people. Not like you and me because something changed in their lives stacking the odds against them causing them to live day to day outside in the heat and cold. The rain and wind. Dirty with no shower. No bathroom. No water. No dignity.

“Like you said: They are homeless, you’re not”

No. I am not. However, I could be. All of us could be. Many of us are one bad incident away from being in the same situation. Divorce, medical bills, alcoholism, a bad decision.  None of us are invincible. Any of us could end up homeless. After all, almost no one is born into a life of homelessness. They end up that way.

“Sounds like you care. Sounds like you no longer care about public disorder and you actually care about the people who are currently homeless. It sounds like you want your fellow Austinites to help you end homelessness.”

Yes. It does sound like that. It is that. We can argue about panhandling, sit/lie, safety and many other issues resulting from homelessness, but that is not homelessness.

“It’s not?”

No, it’s not. It’s a result of being homeless. You see, if you put a homeless person in a home, they are no longer homeless are they? That’s the point. Hungry people need food, jobless people need jobs and homeless people need homes. If we house the homeless, they won’t act homeless. Because they won’t be homeless.

“True.”

So now I ask you to help me. Help me end homelessness. Help stop people dying in the streets. Help people live in homes.

Vote ‘Yes’ to proposition 15.

Vote ‘Yes’ to proposition 1.

Donate to ECHO.

Reach out to me for more ways you can help women, children and men alike live. Inside. With dignity.

Sincerely yours,

T. Marshall Jones